From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of South Carolina
May 24, 2017
2017-MO-009 (S.C. May. 24, 2017)

Opinion

2017-MO-009

05-24-2017

The State, Respondent, v. James Allen Johnson, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2016-000072

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General Robert Bolchoz, Senior Assistant Attorney General J. Benjamin Aplin, and Assistant Attorney General Susannah R. Cole, all of Columbia; and Solicitor William W. Wilkins, III, of Greenville, all for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Heard April 13, 2017

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS.

Appeal From Greenville County The Honorable G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General Robert Bolchoz, Senior Assistant Attorney General J. Benjamin Aplin, and Assistant Attorney General Susannah R. Cole, all of Columbia; and Solicitor William W. Wilkins, III, of Greenville, all for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The court of appeals' opinion, State v. Johnson, Op. No. 2015-UP-378 (S.C. Ct. App. filed July 29, 2015), is affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, because Petitioner's argument that the trial court erred in admitting his incriminating statements is not preserved for our review. See S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. First Carolina Corp. of S.C., 372 S.C. 295, 302, 641 S.E.2d 903, 907 (2007) (stating to preserve an issue at trial for appellate review, the issue must be: (1) raised to and ruled upon by the trial court; (2) raised by the appellant; (3) raised in a timely manner; and (4) raised to the trial court with sufficient specificity). Therefore, we do not address the merits of Petitioner's argument.

AFFIRMED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, FEW, JAMES, JJ., and Acting Justice Maite D. Murphy, concur.


Summaries of

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of South Carolina
May 24, 2017
2017-MO-009 (S.C. May. 24, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. James Allen Johnson, Petitioner. Appellate Case…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: May 24, 2017

Citations

2017-MO-009 (S.C. May. 24, 2017)