From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jenrette

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 8, 2024
No. 2024-UP-166 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 8, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-166 Appellate Case 2021-001108

05-08-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Quatase J. Jenrette, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and Quatase J. Jenrette, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted April 1, 2024

Appeal From Horry County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and Quatase J. Jenrette, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

GEATHERS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Jenrette

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 8, 2024
No. 2024-UP-166 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 8, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Jenrette

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Quatase J. Jenrette, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 8, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-166 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 8, 2024)