From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jenkins

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-125 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-125 Appellate Case 2018-000360

03-23-2022

The State, Respondent, v. Treshawn Markeese Jenkins, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Treshawn Markeese Jenkins, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2022

Appeal From Orangeburg County Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Treshawn Markeese Jenkins, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J, MCDONALD, J, and LOCKEMY, AJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Jenkins

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-125 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Treshawn Markeese Jenkins, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-125 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)