From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jamison

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Jun 16, 2014
No. 70409-5-I (Wash. Ct. App. Jun. 16, 2014)

Opinion

70409-5-I

06-16-2014

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. STACEY ANNIE JAMISON AKA STACEY ANNIE IVES, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

TRICKEY, J.

Stacey Annie Jamison appeals her conviction for third degree assault. She contends the court's to-convict instruction removed a disputed issue of fact from the jury's consideration and commented on the evidence. But she affirmatively agreed with the proposed instruction. Under the invited error doctrine, "even where constitutional rights are involved, we are precluded from reviewing jury instructions when the defendant has proposed an instruction or agreed to its wording." State v. Winings. 126 Wn.App. 75, 89, 107 P.3d 141 (2005). Here, Jamison expressed affirmative agreement to the instruction by joining in the State's proposed instructions. She cannot now challenge that instruction. Although the issue could be reviewed through an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, In re Pers. Restraint of Wilson, 169 Wn.App. 379, 388, 279 P.3d 990 (2012), Jamison has not raised such a claim in this appeal.

Clerk's Papers at 14.

Report of Proceedings (April 2, 2013) at 168-69.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Jamison

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Jun 16, 2014
No. 70409-5-I (Wash. Ct. App. Jun. 16, 2014)
Case details for

State v. Jamison

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. STACEY ANNIE JAMISON AKA STACEY ANNIE…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: Jun 16, 2014

Citations

No. 70409-5-I (Wash. Ct. App. Jun. 16, 2014)