Opinion
2021-KH-01758
11-08-2023
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ENOCH JAMES
Enoch James - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ, Parish of Orleans Criminal, Criminal District Court Number(s) 541-109, Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number(s) 2021-K-0391;
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS
PER CURIAM.
Denied. By pleading guilty unconditionally, applicant waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction. State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584, 586 (La. 1976). Applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof of showing the plea was unknowingly or unintelligently made. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2. Applicant also fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his excessive sentence claim, it is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.