From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 11, 2013
2013-UP-453 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-453

12-11-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Ontaney V. Jackson, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-207548

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia; and Ontaney V. Jackson, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted November 1, 2013

Appeal From Florence County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia; and Ontaney V. Jackson, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 11, 2013
2013-UP-453 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Ontaney V. Jackson, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Citations

2013-UP-453 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)