From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Nov 19, 1982
431 So. 2d 1050 (La. 1982)

Opinion

No. 82-K-2534.

November 19, 1982.


Transferred. In this writ application, the relator seeks review of the revocation of his probation. He does not seek to reverse or modify his conviction or sentence. Hence, this is not a writ application relating to a conviction or a sentence, and does not constitute a matter over which this Court has exclusive jurisdiction. It was properly filed originally in the court of appeal. La.Const. 1974, Art. 5 § 5(E). See State v. James Williams, 418 So.2d 1351.

DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO, J., dissent from the order transferring this application. The only thing this application does "relate to" is the sentence, to determine whether it shall be made executory, and this Court has exclusive jurisdiction.


Summaries of

State v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Nov 19, 1982
431 So. 2d 1050 (La. 1982)
Case details for

State v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. GREGORY HUDSON

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Nov 19, 1982

Citations

431 So. 2d 1050 (La. 1982)

Citing Cases

State v. Mims

We conclude that we also have jurisdiction to consider this assignment notwithstanding the Supreme Court's…

State v. McDonald

Therefore, the writ application was properly filed in the Court of Appeal. State v. Hudson, 431 So.2d 1050…