From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hope

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 1, 2024
No. 2024-UP-138 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-138 Appellate Case 2022-000454

05-01-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Ramon Rodrigo Hope, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, and Ramon Rodrigo Hope, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, all for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted April 1, 2024

Appeal From York County Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, and Ramon Rodrigo Hope, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, all for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hope

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 1, 2024
No. 2024-UP-138 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Hope

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Ramon Rodrigo Hope, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 1, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-138 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)