From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Holt

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 6, 2019
2019-UP-062 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-062

02-06-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Michael Patton Holt, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2016-001745

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and Michael Patton Holt, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2019

Appeal From Greenwood County Frank R. Addy, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and Michael Patton Holt, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, McDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Holt

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 6, 2019
2019-UP-062 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Holt

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Michael Patton Holt, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 6, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-062 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 2019)