State v. Hillman

Full title: The State, Respondent v. Michael Hillman, Appellant.

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 2, 2012

2012-UP-255 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 2, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-255

05-02-2012

The State, Respondent v. Michael Hillman, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., and J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted April 2, 2012

Appeal From Aiken County, Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., and J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Michael Hillman appeals his probation revocation, arguing he did not willfully violate the terms of his probation. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.