State v. Hillman

Full title: The State, Respondent v. Michael Hillman, Appellant.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: May 2, 2012

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-255 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-255

05-02-2012

The State, Respondent v. Michael Hillman, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., and J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Aiken County

Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., and J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Michael Hillman appeals his probation revocation, arguing he did not willfully violate the terms of his probation. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.