From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hill

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 15, 1996
915 P.2d 1057 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

9508-68697; CA A90033

Submitted on record and briefs March 26, Reversed and remanded for new trial May 15, 1996

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Connie L. Isgro, Judge pro tempore.

Michael T. Purcell filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Stephen L. Madkour, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and De Muniz, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for new trial.


Appellant appeals an order of civil commitment under ORS 426.005 et seq. She contends that she was not fully advised of her statutory rights pursuant to ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes error and we agree. State v. Tardanico, 132 Or. App. 230, 888 P.2d 15 (1994); State v. Allison, 129 Or. App. 47, 877 P.2d 660 (1994).

Reversed and remanded for new trial.


Summaries of

State v. Hill

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 15, 1996
915 P.2d 1057 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Susan Hill, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 15, 1996

Citations

915 P.2d 1057 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
915 P.2d 1057