From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Tardanico

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 28, 1994
888 P.2d 15 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

9402-95325; CA A83206

Argued and submitted December 9, reversed and remanded December 28, 1994

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Phillip J. Roth, Judge.

Paul L. Breed argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Stephen L. Madkour, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.


In this mental commitment case, the trial court failed to advise appellant of her rights under ORS 426.100. As we held in State v. May, 131 Or. App. 570, 888 P.2d 14 (1994), advisement of those rights is mandatory, and a failure to advise or to determine that there has been a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to be advised requires reversal.

The state contends that the error was not preserved in the trial court. We conclude that the error is apparent on the face of the record, ORAP 5.45(2), and that it is an egregious one. We exercise our discretion to review the error. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or. 376, 381, 823 P.2d 956 (1991).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Tardanico

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 28, 1994
888 P.2d 15 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Tardanico

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Charlene Tardanico, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 28, 1994

Citations

888 P.2d 15 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
888 P.2d 15

Citing Cases

State v. S.J.F. (In re S.J.F.)

A trial court's failure to advise a person as required or to determine whether the person has waived his or…

State v. Yauger

Reversed and remanded. State v. Tardanico, 132 Or. App. 230, 888 P.2d 15 (1994).…