From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hilario

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Mar 18, 2016
369 P.3d 881 (Haw. Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

holding that "Rule 48 does not appear to require a request or consent of a defendant, so long as his or her attorney moves for a continuance."

Summary of this case from State v. Wilson

Opinion

No. CAAP–13–0003039.

03-18-2016

STATE of Hawai‘i, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Vicente Kotekapika HILARIO, Defendant–Appellant.

Keith S. Shigetomi, on the briefs, for Defendant–Appellant. Tracy Murakami, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, County of Kauai, on the briefs, for Plaintiff–Appellee.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Vacated and Remanded for Dismissal.


Summaries of

State v. Hilario

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Mar 18, 2016
369 P.3d 881 (Haw. Ct. App. 2016)

holding that "Rule 48 does not appear to require a request or consent of a defendant, so long as his or her attorney moves for a continuance."

Summary of this case from State v. Wilson
Case details for

State v. Hilario

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Hawai‘i, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Vicente Kotekapika HILARIO…

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.

Date published: Mar 18, 2016

Citations

369 P.3d 881 (Haw. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Hilario

In 2013, Hilario was tried and convicted of Murder in the First Degree in violation of Hawaii Revised…

State v. Wilson

Indeed, HRPP Rule 48(c)(3) is clear and it "only requires consent from either the defendant or the…