From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hazlett

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-123 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-123 Appellate Case 2019-002108

03-23-2022

The State, Respondent, v. Jacop Robert Lee Hazlett, Appellant.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and Jacop Robert Lee Hazlett, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2022

Appeal From Dorchester County Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and Jacop Robert Lee Hazlett, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J., MCDONALD, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hazlett

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-123 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Hazlett

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Jacop Robert Lee Hazlett, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-123 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)