From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 29, 2024
No. 2024-UP-196 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 29, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-196 Appellate Case 2021-001341

05-29-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Brandy Vernon Harris, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia, and Brandy Vernon Harris, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 1, 2024

Appeal From York County William A. McKinnon, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia, and Brandy Vernon Harris, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

GEATHERS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 29, 2024
No. 2024-UP-196 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 29, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Brandy Vernon Harris, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 29, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-196 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 29, 2024)