noting trial court allowed defendant to voice all complaints where defendant given opportunity at each motion hearing to state concerns and present evidence, trial court inquired about specific allegations raised, and trial court determined that such claims were without legal merit.
Summary of this case from In re C.D.A.No. 90,144.
November 19, 2004.
Appeal from the Sedgwick.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
noting trial court allowed defendant to voice all complaints where defendant given opportunity at each motion hearing to state concerns and present evidence, trial court inquired about specific allegations raised, and trial court determined that such claims were without legal merit.
Summary of this case from In re C.D.A.Full title:STATE v. HAMPTON
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date published: Nov 19, 2004
Under prior Kansas caselaw, Thomas must demonstrate that the hearings at issue were critical stages of the…
In re C.D.A.285 Kan. at 169. See also, e.g., State v. Hampton, No. 90,114, 2004 WL 2659039, at *2 (Kan.App.2004)…