From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hampton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 23, 2013
2013-UP-493 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-493

12-23-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Kenneth Hampton, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-000680

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan and John Benjamin Aplin, both of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted December 1, 2013

Appeal From Lexington County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan and John Benjamin Aplin, both of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hampton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 23, 2013
2013-UP-493 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Hampton

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Kenneth Hampton, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

Citations

2013-UP-493 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2013)