From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Halstead

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-122 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-122 Appellate Case 2019-001863

03-23-2022

The State, Respondent, v. Donald Frank Halstead, III, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, and Donald Frank Halstead, III, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2022

Appeal From Horry County D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, and Donald Frank Halstead, III, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J., MCDONALD, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Halstead

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-122 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Halstead

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Donald Frank Halstead, III, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-122 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)