From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hallbrook

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 1, 2024
No. 2024-UP-135 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-135 Appellate Case 2021-000735

05-01-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Blake Hallbrook, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted March 1, 2024

Appeal From Cherokee County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J., KONDUROS, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hallbrook

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 1, 2024
No. 2024-UP-135 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Hallbrook

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Blake Hallbrook, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 1, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-135 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)