From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gainey

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 25, 2020
2020-UP-081 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2020)

Opinion

2020-UP-081

03-25-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Robert Len Gainey, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-001396

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted February 1, 2020

Appeal From Darlington County Roger E. Henderson, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and GEATHERS, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Gainey

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 25, 2020
2020-UP-081 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2020)
Case details for

State v. Gainey

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Robert Len Gainey, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 25, 2020

Citations

2020-UP-081 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2020)