From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gainey

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Mar 25, 2020
Appellate Case No. 2018-001396 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2018-001396 Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-081

03-25-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Robert Len Gainey, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Darlington County
Roger E. Henderson, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and GEATHERS, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Gainey

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Mar 25, 2020
Appellate Case No. 2018-001396 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2020)
Case details for

State v. Gainey

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Robert Len Gainey, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 25, 2020

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2018-001396 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2020)