From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Feasel

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO
Oct 8, 2014
No. 2 CA-CR 2014-0108 (Ariz. Ct. App. Oct. 8, 2014)

Opinion

No. 2 CA-CR 2014-0108

10-08-2014

THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. DANIEL NATHAN FEASEL, Appellant.

COUNSEL Lori J. Lefferts, Pima County Public Defender By Frank P. Leto, Assistant Public Defender, Tucson Counsel for Appellant


THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
See Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 111(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24.
Appeal from the superior Court in Pima County
No. CR20131865001
The Honorable Teresa Godoy, Judge

AFFIRMED

COUNSEL Lori J. Lefferts, Pima County Public Defender
By Frank P. Leto, Assistant Public Defender, Tucson
Counsel for Appellant

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Judge Vásquez authored the decision of the Court, in which Judge Howard and Judge Brammer concurred. VÁSQUEZ, Judge:

The Hon. J. William Brammer, Jr., a retired judge of this court, is called back to active duty to serve on this case pursuant to orders of this court and the supreme court.

¶1 Following a jury trial, appellant Daniel Feasel was convicted of possession of a deadly weapon by a prohibited possessor, possession of methamphetamine, possession of marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. The trial court sentenced him to enhanced, mitigated, concurrent, prison terms, the longest of which were six years. Counsel has filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530, 2 P.3d 89 (App. 1999), stating he has reviewed the record and has found no "meritorious issue for appeal." Counsel has asked us to search the record for reversible error. Feasel has not filed a supplemental brief.

¶2 Viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's finding of guilt. See State v. Tamplin, 195 Ariz. 246, ¶ 2, 986 P.2d 914, 914 (App. 1999). The evidence presented at trial showed that in April 2012, an officer stopped the vehicle in which Feasel was riding. Feasel, who admitted to officers and stipulated at trial that he was prohibited from possessing a weapon due to a felony conviction, was found with a handgun in his front pants pocket. A backpack containing methamphetamine, marijuana, and "various pieces of paraphernalia," as well as a document for the Social Security Administration bearing Feasel's name, was found "directly in front of" where he had been sitting and he admitted it belonged to him. We further conclude the sentences imposed are within the statutory limit. A.R.S. §§ 13-703(C), (J); 13-3102(A)(4), (M); 13-3405(A)(1), (B)(1); 13-3407(A)(1), (B); 13-3415(A).

¶3 Pursuant to our obligation under Anders, we have searched the record for fundamental, reversible error and have found none. Therefore, we affirm Feasel's convictions and sentences.


Summaries of

State v. Feasel

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO
Oct 8, 2014
No. 2 CA-CR 2014-0108 (Ariz. Ct. App. Oct. 8, 2014)
Case details for

State v. Feasel

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. DANIEL NATHAN FEASEL, Appellant.

Court:ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO

Date published: Oct 8, 2014

Citations

No. 2 CA-CR 2014-0108 (Ariz. Ct. App. Oct. 8, 2014)