State v. Feagin

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. McIver Rembert Feagin, Jr., Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 17, 2014

Appellate Case No. 2012-213695 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-213695 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-460

12-17-2014

The State, Respondent, v. McIver Rembert Feagin, Jr., Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia; and McIver Rembert Feagin, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Florence County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia; and McIver Rembert Feagin, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.