From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Farnsworth

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
Jan 13, 2015
340 P.3d 890 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

In Farnsworth, we agreed that a robbery conviction based on its facts would have blurred the lines between theft and robbery and that if the legislature wanted "to define all thefts from financial institutions as robberies, it may act accordingly."

Summary of this case from State v. Yanac

Opinion

No. 43167–0–II.

2015-01-13

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Charles V. FARNSWORTH, Jr., Appellant.


Editor's Note: The opinion of the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2, in State v. Farnsworth, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 340 P.3d 890, was withdrawn from the bound volume because of a publisher's error. For superseding opinion, see 2014 WL 8336343.


Summaries of

State v. Farnsworth

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
Jan 13, 2015
340 P.3d 890 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015)

In Farnsworth, we agreed that a robbery conviction based on its facts would have blurred the lines between theft and robbery and that if the legislature wanted "to define all thefts from financial institutions as robberies, it may act accordingly."

Summary of this case from State v. Yanac

In State v. Farnsworth, ___ Wn. App. ___, 340 P.3d 890, 892-93 (2014), we addressed the same issue as in this case—the sufficiency of the evidence to establish an implied threat to a bank teller during an alleged robbery.

Summary of this case from State v. Yanac

In Farnsworth, we agreed that a robbery conviction based on its facts would have blurred the lines between theft and robbery and that if the legislature wanted "to define all thefts from financial institutions as robberies, it may act accordingly."

Summary of this case from State v. Yanac

In State v. Farnsworth, __ Wn. App. ___, 340 P.3d 890, 892-93 (2014), we addressed the same issue as in this case-the sufficiency of the evidence to establish an implied threat to a bank teller during an alleged robbery.

Summary of this case from State v. Yanac
Case details for

State v. Farnsworth

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Charles V. FARNSWORTH, Jr., Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

Date published: Jan 13, 2015

Citations

340 P.3d 890 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

State v. Yanac

CP at 117. In State v. Farnsworth, ___ Wn. App. ___, 340 P.3d 890, 892-93 (2014), we addressed the same issue…

State v. Yanac

CP at 117. In State v. Farnsworth, __ Wn. App. ___, 340 P.3d 890, 892-93 (2014), we addressed the same…