Summary
In Farnsworth, we agreed that a robbery conviction based on its facts would have blurred the lines between theft and robbery and that if the legislature wanted "to define all thefts from financial institutions as robberies, it may act accordingly."
Summary of this case from State v. YanacOpinion
No. 43167–0–II.
2015-01-13
Editor's Note: The opinion of the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2, in State v. Farnsworth, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 340 P.3d 890, was withdrawn from the bound volume because of a publisher's error. For superseding opinion, see 2014 WL 8336343.