From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ennen

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Jul 13, 2011
803 N.W.2d 834 (N.D. 2011)

Opinion

No. 20110003.

Decided July 13, 2011.

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Robert O. Wefald, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Jackson John Lofgren, Assistant State's Attorney, Morton County Courthouse, 210 2nd Avenue Northwest, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.


Per Curiam.


[¶ 1] John Ennen appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of surreptitious intrusion, a class C felony, under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-12.2. On appeal, Ennen argues the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction and the district court committed reversible error when it responded to the jury's request for a ruler outside of his presence. We conclude sufficient evidence exists to support the verdict. On this record, we conclude the court's decision to comply with the jury's request for a ruler was harmless error. See State v. Hatch, 346 N.W.2d 268, 278 (N.D. 1984) (violation of defendant's right to be present during communication between the judge and the jury after the case has been submitted to the jury may be harmless error). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J., Carol Ronning Kapsner, Mary Muehlen Maring, Daniel J. Crothers, Dale V. Sandstrom.


Summaries of

State v. Ennen

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Jul 13, 2011
803 N.W.2d 834 (N.D. 2011)
Case details for

State v. Ennen

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. John Karl Ennen…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Jul 13, 2011

Citations

803 N.W.2d 834 (N.D. 2011)
2011 N.D. 130

Citing Cases

Ennen v. State

[¶ 1] John Ennen appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief. After an…