From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ennen v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
May 14, 2013
832 N.W.2d 334 (N.D. 2013)

Opinion

No. 20120408.

2013-05-14

John Karl ENNEN, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland, Judge. Kent M. Morrow, Bismarck, N.D., for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. Jackson J. Lofgren, Assistant State's Attorney, Mandan, N.D., for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.


Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland, Judge.
Kent M. Morrow, Bismarck, N.D., for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. Jackson J. Lofgren, Assistant State's Attorney, Mandan, N.D., for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] John Ennen appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court decided Ennen did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel in proceedings culminating with this Court's summary affirmance of his conviction for surreptitious intrusion. See State v. Ennen, 2011 ND 130, ¶ 1, 803 N.W.2d 834. We conclude the district court did not err in deciding Ennen did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., MARY MUEHLEN MARING, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, DALE V. SANDSTROM, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ennen v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
May 14, 2013
832 N.W.2d 334 (N.D. 2013)
Case details for

Ennen v. State

Case Details

Full title:John Karl ENNEN, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: May 14, 2013

Citations

832 N.W.2d 334 (N.D. 2013)
2013 N.D. 66