From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dixon

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jul 29, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-002386 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 29, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-002386 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-385

07-29-2015

The State, Respondent, v. David Eric Dixon, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and David Eric Dixon, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Marlboro County
J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and David Eric Dixon, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, LOCKEMY, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Dixon

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jul 29, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-002386 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 29, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Dixon

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. David Eric Dixon, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 29, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-002386 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 29, 2015)