From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dixon

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jul 29, 2015
2015-UP-385 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 29, 2015)

Opinion

2015-UP-385

07-29-2015

The State, Respondent, v. David Eric Dixon, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-002386

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and David Eric Dixon, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted June 1, 2015

Appeal From Marlboro County J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and David Eric Dixon, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, LOCKEMY, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Dixon

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jul 29, 2015
2015-UP-385 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 29, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Dixon

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. David Eric Dixon, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 29, 2015

Citations

2015-UP-385 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 29, 2015)