State v. Dingle

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Samuel Dingle, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 23, 2014

Appellate Case No. 2011-193567 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-193567 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-475

12-23-2014

The State, Respondent, v. Samuel Dingle, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, and Appellant Defenders Breen Richard Stevens and Benjamin John Tripp, all of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor David Michael Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal from Orangeburg County
Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, and Appellant Defenders Breen Richard Stevens and Benjamin John Tripp, all of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor David Michael Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Donahue, 400 S.C. 604, 607 n.1, 735 S.E.2d 547, 549 n.1 (Ct. App. 2012) (noting an argument that is not presented to the trial judge is not preserved for appellate review); State v. Stroman, 281 S.C. 508, 513, 316 S.E.2d 395, 399 (1984) ("[A] party cannot complain of an error which his own conduct has induced." (internal quotation marks omitted)). AFFIRMED. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.