State v. Dimitroff

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Stanley Anthony Dimitroff II, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 11, 2020

Appellate Case No. 2018-000501 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 11, 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2018-000501 Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-068

03-11-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Stanley Anthony Dimitroff II, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Oconee County
R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.