From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Day

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 10, 2021
2021-UP-035 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-035

02-10-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Mark Emil Day, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-001918

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Charleston County Roger M. Young, Sr., Circuit Court Judge

Submitted January 1, 2021

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Day

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 10, 2021
2021-UP-035 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Day

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Mark Emil Day, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 10, 2021

Citations

2021-UP-035 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2021)