State v. Day

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Mark Emil Day, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 10, 2021

Appellate Case No. 2018-001918 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2021)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2018-001918 Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-035

02-10-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Mark Emil Day, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Charleston County
Roger M. Young, Sr., Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.