From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davis

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 27, 2018
Appellate Case No. 2017-000190 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 27, 2018)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2017-000190 Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-270

06-27-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Curt Davis, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, and Curt Davis, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Lexington County
Eugene C. Griffith, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, and Curt Davis, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Davis

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 27, 2018
Appellate Case No. 2017-000190 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 27, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Curt Davis, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 27, 2018

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2017-000190 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 27, 2018)