From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dantonyo Andropulis Heath

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 14, 2015
2015-UP-487 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2015)

Opinion

2015-UP-487

10-14-2015

The State, Respondent, v. Dantonyo Andropulis Heath, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-001663

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.


Unpublished Opinion

Submitted September 1, 2015

Appeal From York County John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Baccus, 367 S.C. 41, 48, 625 S.E.2d 216, 220 (2006) ("In criminal cases, the appellate court sits to review errors of law only."); Gibson v. State, 334 S.C. 515, 524, 514 S.E.2d 320, 324 (1999) ("[A Brady claim is complete if the accused can demonstrate (1) the evidence was favorable to the accused, (2) it was in the possession of or known to the prosecution, (3) it was suppressed by the prosecution, and (4) it was material to guilt or punishment." (footnote omitted)); State v. Taylor, 333 S.C. 159, 177, 508 S.E.2d 870, 879 (1998) ("Evidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different." (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)); id. ("A 'reasonable probability' is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome." (internal quotation marks omitted)).

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Dantonyo Andropulis Heath

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 14, 2015
2015-UP-487 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Dantonyo Andropulis Heath

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Dantonyo Andropulis Heath, Appellant. Appellate…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 14, 2015

Citations

2015-UP-487 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2015)