State v. Cunningham

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Osles Cunningham, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 18, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2012-212762 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-212762 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-464

12-18-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Osles Cunningham, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Lancaster County

D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.