From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Criminger

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jul 3, 2024
No. 2024-UP-228 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 3, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-228 Appellate Case 2022-001648

07-03-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Billy Franklin Criminger, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted June 1, 2024

Appeal From Lancaster County Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

GEATHERS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Criminger

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jul 3, 2024
No. 2024-UP-228 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 3, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Criminger

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Billy Franklin Criminger, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 3, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-228 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 3, 2024)