From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Crim

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 10, 2014
2014-UP-454 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2014)

Opinion

2014-UP-454

12-10-2014

The State, Respondent, v. Shondel Antwan Crim, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-001993

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted October 1, 2014

Appeal From Lexington County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Bryant, 383 S.C. 410, 418, 680 S.E.2d 11, 15 (Ct. App. 2009) ("An issue must be raised and ruled upon in the circuit court in order to be preserved for appellate review.").

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C. J, and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ, concur


Summaries of

State v. Crim

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 10, 2014
2014-UP-454 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2014)
Case details for

State v. Crim

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Shondel Antwan Crim, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 10, 2014

Citations

2014-UP-454 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2014)