State v. Craven

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Anthony Houlk Craven, Appellant.

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 8, 2021

No. 2021-UP-428 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-428 Appellate Case 2020-000777

12-08-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Anthony Houlk Craven, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2021

Appeal From Berkeley County Roger M. Young, Sr., Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur