State v. Coleman

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. William T. Coleman, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 18, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2012-212338 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-212338 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-476

12-18-2013

The State, Respondent, v. William T. Coleman, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and William T. Coleman, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and William T. Coleman, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.