From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-135 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-135 Appellate Case 2020-000385

03-23-2022

The State, Respondent, v. William Bruce Clark, Jr., Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted February 1, 2022

Appeal From Marion County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J, and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ, concur


Summaries of

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-135 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. William Bruce Clark, Jr., Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-135 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)