State v. Chavez

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. David Chavez, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 5, 2012

Appellate Case No. 2010-178649 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 5, 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2010-178649 Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-637

12-05-2012

The State, Respondent, v. David Chavez, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Brendan Jackson McDonald, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina Theos Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Oconee County

Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Brendan Jackson McDonald, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina Theos Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule 611(d), SCRE ("A witness may be re-examined as to the same matters to which he testified only in the discretion of the court, but without exception he may be re-examined as to any new matter brought out during cross-examination."); State v. Stroman, 281 S.C. 508, 513, 316 S.E.2d 395, 399 (1984) ("The scope of redirect rests in the discretion of the trial court."). AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.