State v. Carelock

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Roshune L. Carelock, Appellant.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: May 9, 2012

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-287 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 9, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-287

05-09-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Roshune L. Carelock, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, and Roshune L. Carelock, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted April 2, 2012

Appeal From Lancaster County Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, and Roshune L. Carelock, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Roshune L. Carelock appeals his conviction for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, arguing the circuit court erred in admitting the testimony of a paramedic regarding statements made by the victim when the State failed to disclose the paramedic's report prior to trial. Additionally, Carelock filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.