From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Buckmon

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 13, 2019
2019-UP-072 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 13, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-072

02-13-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Michael Paul Buckmon, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2016-002257

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Michael Paul Buckmon, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2019

Appeal From Barnwell County Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Michael Paul Buckmon, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C. J, and THOMAS and GEATHERS, JJ, concur


Summaries of

State v. Buckmon

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 13, 2019
2019-UP-072 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 13, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Buckmon

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Michael Paul Buckmon, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 13, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-072 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 13, 2019)