State v. Brogdon

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Michael Alexander Brogdon, Appellant.

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 9, 2012

2012-UP-282 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 9, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-282

05-09-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Michael Alexander Brogdon, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant. J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Unpublished Opinion

Submitted April 2, 2012

Appeal From Sumter County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Michael Alexander Brogdon appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court abused its discretion in revoking his probation because he needed drug addiction treatment rather than a prison sentence. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.