From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brightman

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 21, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2014-000313 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2014-000313 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-494

10-21-2015

The State, Respondent, v. Lenard Brightman, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, and Lenard Brightman, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Charleston County
W. Jeffrey Young, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, and Lenard Brightman, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Brightman

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 21, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2014-000313 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Brightman

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Lenard Brightman, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 21, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2014-000313 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2015)