From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Braxton

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 31, 2018
Appellate Case No. 2016-002341 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2018)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2016-002341 Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-400

10-31-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Daniel Caleb Braxton, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Orangeburg County
Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Braxton

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 31, 2018
Appellate Case No. 2016-002341 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Braxton

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Daniel Caleb Braxton, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 31, 2018

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2016-002341 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2018)