From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Beckman

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County
Feb 11, 2004
No. C-030494 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2004)

Opinion

No. C-030494.

February 11, 2004

Trial No. B-0303984A.


JUDGMENT ENTRY.

This appeal is considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, and this Judgment Entry shall not be considered an Opinion of the Court pursuant to S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 3(A).

Defendant-appellant Stephen Beckman appeals from the judgment of the trial court convicting him, following the entry of a no-contest plea, of carrying a concealed firearm in violation of R.C. 2923.12. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In his single assignment of error, Beckman contends that the trial court erred by entering a judgment of conviction because R.C. 2923.12 is unconstitutional. We overrule this assignment on the authority of Klein v. Leis. In Klein, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of R.C. 2923.12.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.

Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Painter, JJ.


Summaries of

State v. Beckman

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County
Feb 11, 2004
No. C-030494 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2004)
Case details for

State v. Beckman

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen Beckman, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County

Date published: Feb 11, 2004

Citations

No. C-030494 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2004)