From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bauberger

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 15, 2006
361 N.C. 105 (N.C. 2006)

Opinion

No. 172A06.

December 15, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 176 N.C. App. ___, 626 S.E.2d 700 (2006), finding no error in judgments entered on 15 August 2003 and an order denying defendant's Motion for Appropriate Relief entered on 4 February 2004, all entered by Judge John O. Craig, III, in Superior Court, Forsyth County, following jury verdicts finding defendant guilty of second-degree murder and assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury. Heard in the Supreme Court 22 November 2006.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Counsel, for the State. Kathryn L. VandenBerg for defendant-appellant.


Justice WAINWRIGHT took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Harrison, 360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Bauberger

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 15, 2006
361 N.C. 105 (N.C. 2006)
Case details for

State v. Bauberger

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIAM THOMAS BAUBERGER

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 15, 2006

Citations

361 N.C. 105 (N.C. 2006)

Citing Cases

State v. Burke

This Court has previously decided the issue presented by defendant, and held that a trial court does not err…

State v. Burke

This Court has previously decided the issue presented by defendant, and held that a trial court does not err…